Pixel UX Researcher
soul · design · by toli
UX researcher that evaluates interfaces by how they feel to use, not just how they look. Finds where users are thinking about the tool instead of their goal. Delivers severity-rated findings with specific recommendations a developer can implement without interpretation. **How it works:** - Evaluates user flows from the first-time user perspective, catching friction that power users have adapted to and no longer notice - Counts cognitive load per task: every choice, label, and step adds mental burden, and the agent fights to reduce decision count - Rates UX issues by severity: critical (users cannot complete task), major (noticeable struggle), minor (workaround exists), cosmetic (polish) - Delivers findings with specific fix recommendations, not just problem statements: "Users struggled because shipping form appeared before payment, swap the order" - Tests accessibility as a quality bar, not a feature: screen reader compatibility, keyboard navigation, color contrast, and touch target sizing **What makes it different:** Most UX reviews evaluate aesthetics. Pixel evaluates effectiveness. A beautiful screen that confuses users is a failure. An ugly screen that gets users to their goal in three clicks is a success that needs styling. Every finding comes with a severity rating and a specific implementation recommendation, not vague suggestions. From the awesome-openclaw-agents collection (1,700+ GitHub stars). Original author: @mergisi. Source: github.com/mergisi/awesome-openclaw-agents.
Price: Free
Downloads: 0 · Version: 1.0.0
Rating: No reviews yet
Tags: ux, research, usability, accessibility, design
API: GET /api/v2/items/ux-researcher
P
AgentDesign
Pixel UX Researcher
Finds where users think about the tool instead of their goal
Free
UX researcher that evaluates interfaces by how they feel to use, not just how they look. Finds where users are thinking about the tool instead of their goal. Delivers severity-rated findings with specific recommendations a developer can implement without interpretation.
How it works:
- Evaluates user flows from the first-time user perspective, catching friction that power users have adapted to and no longer notice
- Counts cognitive load per task: every choice, label, and step adds mental burden, and the agent fights to reduce decision count
- Rates UX issues by severity: critical (users cannot complete task), major (noticeable struggle), minor (workaround exists), cosmetic (polish)
- Delivers findings with specific fix recommendations, not just problem statements: "Users struggled because shipping form appeared before payment, swap the order"
- Tests accessibility as a quality bar, not a feature: screen reader compatibility, keyboard navigation, color contrast, and touch target sizing
What makes it different: Most UX reviews evaluate aesthetics. Pixel evaluates effectiveness. A beautiful screen that confuses users is a failure. An ugly screen that gets users to their goal in three clicks is a success that needs styling. Every finding comes with a severity rating and a specific implementation recommendation, not vague suggestions.
From the awesome-openclaw-agents collection (1,700+ GitHub stars). Original author: @mergisi. Source: github.com/mergisi/awesome-openclaw-agents.
// security
Screened
Automated scanLast scanned Not available
Screening language is intentionally conservative. Review the bundle contents and capability needs before installing.
v1.0.0
Latest
Today389.3 KBInitial draft upload
Free
// related
Explore the neighborhood
Nearby items, alternatives, and more from the same creator.